Arina Tanemura Art Manual Of Style
Is it verifiable with no original research?A. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: All issues addressd B. Series The Gentlemen’s Alliance.
The second sentence of "early life", as written, seems self-contradictory if the television had anime, that was still surely a form of entertainment? Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: An image would be nice, but PD images are hard to come by for less well-known people B.
Lullabying ( talk) 06:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC) In the interview she states that she was reading comics about "adult" topics such as extramarital affairs from a young age. See shojo manga and josei manga for differences. "magazines aimed at an older female demographic" can we be more specific about what types of magazines these were? Done lullabying ( talk) 21:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Lullabying ( talk) 06:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
"she had passed the first round of submissions" I'm uncertain as to what this means I think you're saying she passed the first round of selection, but it's a bit unclear. I mean, "at the time when she started drawing." lullabying ( talk) 06:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC) "from that time" which time? This is ambiguous. You need to clarify that they are manga, at the very least.
If I were to draw every day, the number of pages I draw would increase. Lullabying ( talk) 06:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC) I meant to write that she started drawing yonkoma and then increased the number of pages as she continued. "she began practicing by drawing four pages of yonkoma" I think you mean to say four pages a day, or something similar otherwise this is confusing. Lullabying ( talk) 06:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Lullabying ( talk) 06:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Special issue seems to be the right term. "Despite being published in a separate edition" does "edition" have a specific meaning with respect to manga? Otherwise, I think "supplement" or "special issue" is the term you are looking for. Lullabying ( talk) 21:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC) This is the original text from her interview: でも、「まずはつけペンに慣れなきゃ」「修行しなきゃ」と思って、長いストーリーではなく、4コマを投稿し始めたんですよ。そしたら賞をいただいて。4コマ部門は5ページくらいで投稿できるんですけど、最初に投稿した作品で結構な賞金をもらえちゃったんです。「5ページでこんなに賞金をもらうわけにはいかない」と思って、16ページ・32本くらいの4コマを投稿していました。そこでギャグを描くのが楽しくなりましたね。 I decided to remove the text as it does seem unclear.
Then please say that "special edition" isn't conveying that point. Lullabying ( talk) 09:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Ribon is the main magazine. Ribon Original is an alternate magazine of Ribon that is published on a less frequent basis.
I actually do not have a source a lot of the sources just call it a breakthrough. Do you have a source saying that? If so, please say that instead I would omit the "breakthrough" label. Lullabying ( talk) 06:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC) But I.O.N was popular enough to become her first multi-chapter story. "The Style of the Second Love" was her debut work and she got positive feedback from it. The first paragraph of "career" also sounds somewhat inconsistent if "The Style of the Second Love" brought her early fame, why is it that the ION is referred to as her breakthrough work? If ION was a bigger breakthrough, then surely there ought to be more details substantiating that?
Lullabying ( talk) 06:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC) I don't think it was disclosed. "but she was forced to cut the series short" do we know why? Otherwise, it's an odd thing to say. Lullabying ( talk) 23:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC) I found a source saying that it was her first series, so I will include that.
I included a better source about it. Lullabying ( talk) 19:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC) This report states that she cut it short because the main character, Kyoko, did not appeal to the magazine's target demographic according to official polls. Vanamonde ( Talk) 16:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Tanemura is also known to be a huge idol singer fan, though I'm not sure how relevant that is to the article. Full Moon o Sagashite is a story about idol singers, and she started the series out of a desire to write lyrics for the songs her characters would sing. What is it about "Full Moon o Sagashite" that allowed Tanemura to write lyrics? It is unclear at the moment.
Lullabying ( talk) 22:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC) "intentionally gave the story a different tone compared to The Gentlemen's Alliance Cross" Unless you have information about how the tone was different, I'd omit this it doesn't really tell the reader anything. Lullabying ( talk) 21:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Done This information has been included.
Unless you can find a source saying that directly, I would paraphrase this to something like "she tries to reflect contemporary styles in her drawing", or something similar, but simple. An interview isn't good enough for the statement "and she drew according to trends she believes are fashionably popular at that time, resulting in her unique art style". Lullabying ( talk) 19:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC) She had an exclusive contract with the Ribon magazine and thus was only allowed to produce artwork or series under that magazine and publisher.
This is the case for most prolific authors, just so you know see, for instance, Ursula K. The full list doesn't really belong here. I would recommend either splitting this off into a "list of works" article, or just pruning this down to her best known works. The list of works is rather long it's taking up more space than the prose section of the article. Lullabying ( talk) 21:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
A very small fraction of authors are notable enough that all their works meet WP:N. All her works are not notable, that's my point. Lullabying ( talk) 21:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Aside from that, her published works are notable and do deserve a mention. I tried modeling on Akira Toriyama, which was a GA and lists all of his works.
I'm not going to fail it over this now, but please take this point seriously. If you don't, someone else is likely to split the list off if not, I would expect the article would fail criterion 3b fairly soon. This is particularly true because Tanemura is young, and her list will presumably grow.
You could also replace some of the stuff about her publications with a sentence about other activities she has done. I'd suggest trimming it a little, since the article is also short, and then adding a sentence or two about her style and characters. The lead, at the moment, is too much of a list of her publications, and not really a summary of the article.
0 kommentar(er)
